Regarded as a failure
by most critics and a masterpiece by a few, UNDER CAPRICORN is one of
Alfred Hitchcock's most unusual films in terms of setting, subject
matter, and cinematic approach.
The main storyline concerns Irish noblewoman Lady Henrietta Flusky (Ingrid Bergman) and her working-class husband Sam (Joseph Cotten), who flee to colonial Australia to escape a secret and tragic past. The film works best during the scenes set in the Flusky mansion, where Hitchcock employs the 10-minute takes he pioneered in ROPE to much greater effect. The technique verged on the gimmicky in ROPE, but in UNDER CAPRICORN the lingering, uninterrupted shots are almost poetic in effect, creating a haunting and ominous undertone.
It is during the film's other scenes that things
tend to fall apart, with Hitchcock merely going through the motions of
laying out the exposition in a rather pedestrian manner. Though
it's difficult to accept Bergman as an Irishwoman, she nevertheless
delivers one of her most varied and powerful performances. Cotten
is mostly effective in a rather dour and one-note role, whereas Michael
Wilding (who probably has more screen time than Cotten) is too polished
and mannered to capture the frivolous nature of his character. It
is Margaret Leighton who nearly steals the picture as the housemaid
Millie, one of Hitchcock's most evil villainesses since Judith
Anderson's Mrs. Danvers in REBECCA. For me, UNDER CAPRICORN is a
deeply flawed film with numerous moments of brilliance. And
somehow I love every minute of it.
½ -
JL