Two college students (John Dall and Farley Granger) consider themselves
morally superior to everyone else and decide to commit a
murder just for the thrill of it. Based loosely on the
Leopold-Loeb murder case of the 1920s, ROPE is most noted for Alfred
Hitchcock's experimental use of the camera. The film is staged
much as a one-set play, which allowed Hitchcock to create the illusion
of one continuous film-length take, with no apparent edits or alternate
camera angles. It's a mostly effective gimmick, in that it
allowed Hitchcock total control of audience focus, though he was to
explore the technique's possibilities more effectively for certain
scenes in UNDER CAPRICORN (1949). ROPE was not a financial
success upon its release, probably because Warner Bros. was reluctant
to promote a film in which two leading characters were obviously
homosexual. Though he ignores any gay subtext in his own
character, James Stewart delivers a strong performance as the professor
who solves the murder, even as he realizes the young killers have
twisted his own philosophy as justification for their crime. Not
one of Hitchcock's masterpieces, but one of the best among his
second-tier work.
- JL
ROPE leaves me cold. Although long takes
are an effective tool (see TOUCH OF EVIL, THE PLAYER or just about any
Kurosawa film), I believe that the brain, trained
by years of watching movies and television, eventually wants shots,
cuts and edits
in film. If you know the gimmick of the film, you may find
yourself distracted by the lack of edits, losing your place in the
story and dialogue as you wait for the inevitable shot of somebody's
back to fill the frame in order for Hitch to get a seamless edit and
keep the illusion going. I applaud the creativity, but I enjoy
Hitch's other experiments like LIFEBOAT and REAR WINDOW much
more.
½
- JB