According to the
almost unprecedented year-long prerelease chatter in the mainstream
media, you
would have thought Mel Gibson's film about the final hours of Christ
was going to cause riots in the street and bloodshed everywhere.
Without even seeing the film, they branded it as anti-Semitic.
Once they saw the film, and still hoping for those riots to prove their point, many critics used torturous logic as to why THE PASSION was anti-Semitic. After not a single riot broke out in America over the film, the media and critics began to worry that THE PASSION was too violent. Don't bring the kids! Don't bring the dog! Don't bring yourselves! This from some people who considered such extremely violent films as KILL BILL and PULP FICTION to be cinematic works of art. (Albeit they may be, PULP FICTION especially - but then again, so is this film).
What idiocy. I went to see THE
PASSION as an act
of protest against the mainsteam media, especially The New York Times,
which had attacked this
particular
film with a furvor I had never seen before. I figured if The Times
didn't want me to see this film, there had to be something good about
it. I came out of THE
PASSION almost literally too weak to walk
home.
THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST
is an emotionally overwhelming film, beautifully
shot, beautifully acted, beautifully directed. The extreme
violence of Christ's torture and death is displayed
without reservation, and may be too much for some viewers, but, unlike
much of the violence found in Hollywood films, it has a point far more
important than "Hey, kids, look at the cool blood!". No other
film has
ever depicted Christ's pain and suffering in such
graphic detail, and while some may see it as gratuitous, others see the
graphic
violence as essential to the film.
Hollywood was so fearful of this
film, no major studio would touch it. So Mel Gibson financed it
himself. After all the negative publicity, THE PASSION OF THE
CHRIST was a box-office and cultural phenomenon. By the end of
2004, it had outgrossed every film
of 2004 that wasn't named SHREK 2 and SPIDERMAN 2. It didn't hurt
that the year of negative publicity firmly made the public very curious
about it.
True to form, once Hollywood saw that
there was a large Christian audience willing to spend oodles of cash on a movie
that was respectful to their beliefs, it cranked out film after
film marketed directly to this
audience. Oh, wait. No it didn't. But I hear they did
consider doing the next direct to video AMERICAN PIE sequel in Aramaic.
- JB